Research

Funding First-Rate Children’s Cancer Research With St. Baldrick’s Summer Grants

by St. Baldrick's Foundation
May 29, 2014

st_baldricks_summer_grants

There is something more exciting than barbecues, beach balls, and sprinklers in the summertime at the St. Baldrick’s Foundation. Every summer, childhood cancer research grants are awarded to the best and most-promising researchers and institutions in the world — bringing us one step closer to a cure for childhood cancers.

Here’s how our grant funding cycles work:

Read more »


Research

International Scholars Grants Broaden the Borders of Childhood Cancer Research

by St. Baldrick's Foundation
July 16, 2013

Dr-Joseph-Lubega-in-lab

Dr. Joseph Lubega is one of two childhood cancer researchers to receive the new St. Baldrick’s International Scholars Grant. Dr. Lubega’s research is focused on finding better ways to diagnose children with cancer in Uganda.

Childhood cancer knows no boundaries. Cancer affects kids around the world, no matter the child’s race, ethnicity, wealth, or poverty. In many developed countries, and here in the United States, we are fortunate to have cutting edge diagnostic tools and extensive catalogs of cancer research that help us give our kids the best cancer treatment available.

But the reality is, most children with cancer do not live in developed countries. Indeed, the majority of kids with cancer live in countries with very limited resources. And for those children, a cancer diagnosis is almost always fatal — if a diagnosis is made at all.

Read more »


Research

St. Baldrick’s Foundation Scientific Review Process

by St. Baldrick's Foundation
October 1, 2012

While shavees and volunteers are raising funds to be used for grants, researchers are making their way through a rigorous grant application process. The St. Baldrick’s Foundation had over 100 reviewers from the pediatric hematology and oncology community review grants in 2012.

Each application is reviewed by at least three pediatric hematology/oncology researchers, using the same rating system used by the National Cancer Institute. If all three reviewers give an application an excellent score, it’s recommended for funding. (A poor score from all three means it’s not recommended.) If the scores vary or are not decisive, the application goes to a larger committee of reviewers to discuss and vote on a final score.

Read more »


« Newer Posts